Friday, February 15, 2013

Why gun ownership among US women is climbing | MinnPost

Owning or carrying a gun remains mostly a guy thing, but American women who pack heat ? or at least keep a pistol in the nightstand drawer ??are often Exhibit A in the case for broad access to firearms for personal protection.

The opposite contention, that having a gun in the house actually makes women less safe, is the rebuttal from those who say the country needs to make guns less accessible.

As Congress, President Obama, and the nation debate the need for stricter gun laws, women?s safety is emerging as a heated and emotional issue ? and one that is almost impossible to ?prove? on one side or the other. Every time gun rights defenders cite an incident of a young mother defending herself and her children by shooting an intruder, gun control advocates point to a woman fatally shot in a case of domestic violence.?

But it would appear that as women themselves do the calculus, a small but growing share is coming down on the side of having a gun. The gun-gravitation is not drastic: 15 percent of women in the US own guns. That, however, is up from 12 percent as recently as 2007, according to a Gallup poll released earlier this month.

Julie Warren, a consultant in Colorado Springs, Colo., keeps a handgun in her house for safety and recreation. After serving in the Air Force, she doesn?t think twice about having it.

?There is peace of mind,? she says, ?knowing that you have something you can do to overpower anyone coming through the door.?

Broadly speaking, polls show women are more inclined than men to support new gun control proposals before Congress. Women support stricter gun laws in general ? 62 percent compared with 40 percent of men, according to a Quinnipiac poll released Feb. 7. Sixty-eight percent of women support a nationwide ban on the sale of assault weapons, versus 44 percent of men, and 65 percent of women favor a limit on high-capacity ammunition magazines, while 46 percent of men do, the poll found. Both women and men overwhelmingly support background checks for all gun buyers, 94 percent and 90 percent, respectively.

But the argument that women need guns for personal safety and home defense resonates with many women ? some of whom see government efforts to curtail gun access as a threat to their rights.

?We always hear about a woman?s right to choose, and we are women who want the right to choose how to protect our lives,? says Jenn Coffey, national director of legislative affairs for Second Amendment Sisters, a women's advocacy group with the motto ?self defense is a human right.?

?Gun-control laws degrade our rights, and put more rights in the hands of criminals,? Ms. Coffey adds.

Aside from polls showing an uptick in gun ownership among women, there is other evidence that women are becoming more familiar with firearms.

The National Rifle Association, for one, is conducting more training sessions directed at women. Its Women on Target program, which started in 2000 with 500 participants, had 9,500 attendees in 2011. (The NRA does not release figures for membership.)?

For another, Coffey says her local chapter of Second Amendment Sisters, in Andover, N.H., has seen a big upswing in participants at its safety trainings and target practices. The Texas-based organization, founded in 1999, now has more than 10,000 members across the US.

Women also appear to be taking greater part in gun sports. Five million women took part in target shooting in 2011, a 51.5 percent jump from 2001, according to the National Sporting Goods Association. Women who hunt increased 41.8 percent in the same period, from 1.8 million to 2.6 million, according to the association's annual sports participation reports.

But personal safety is the overriding reason women become interested in guns, at least initially, experts agree.

?Women typically own guns for safety reasons, then branch out to target shooting and hunting,? says NRA spokeswoman Stephanie Samford. ?Men, on the other hand, get into guns for hunting. Safety is a secondary concern.?

Paxton Quigley, the author of women?s self-defense and gun books, says broad lifestyle changes ? women waiting longer to get married, choosing to live alone, and more ofter serving as head of household ? coincides with?women?s rising interest in guns.

?There is a different attitude now, that women need to take responsibility for their own safety,? she says.

In the past 20 years, Ms. Quigley has taught more than 7,000 women how to use a handgun ? women who aren?t necessarily ardent Second Amendment supporters, but ordinary citizens who want to protect themselves.

?I?ve taught women from all walks of life ? housewives, doctors, lawyers, and teachers,? she says.

Doubts persist, however, about the degree to which a gun improves personal safety. Having a gun in the home creates more risk, including higher rates of homicide victimization, suicide attempts, and accidental shootings, studies show.

A 2006 Gallup Poll found that 49 percent of women thought having a gun in the house made it more dangerous, while 39 percent thought it made the house safer. According to a recent Monitor/TIPP poll, 46 percent of households have guns.

A gun in the home can put women at higher risk of personal injury, says David Hemenway, director of the Harvard Injury Control Research Center in Cambridge, Mass.

?There is little evidence that guns are effective when it comes to self-defense,? he says.

In his book ?Private Guns, Public Health,? Dr. Hemenway argues that in high-gun states (determined by average levels of household gun ownership), the rates at which women experience gun violence are higher than in low-gun states: 3.5 times higher for gun homicides, 6 times higher for gun suicide, and 7 times higher for accidental death by gun.

Nationwide, 52 percent of homicides in which women were the victims (about 1,700 in 2010) were committed with firearms, according to the Violence Policy Center?s analysis of 2010 FBI homicide data.

?Statistics show that when females are killed, it's more likely, over 50 percent of the time, to be by a spouse or household member,? said Baltimore Police Chief Jim Johnson during a Senate hearing on gun violence Jan. 30. ?A gun in a home where there is a history of domestic violence, statistics show that there is a 500 percent increase of chance that that person will be victimized by gun violence.?

Simone Smith, a marketing director in San Francisco, says she chooses not to rely on a gun for personal safety, but rather focuses on ways to reduce the likelihood of attracting criminals.

?I don?t want to have a loaded gun under my bed,? Ms. Smith says. ?I wouldn?t sleep well.?

She has nothing against guns ? she grew up in a family that used guns for recreation ? but she says there are more effective things women can do for their personal security.

?Being aware of your neighborhood, making sure your curtains are closed, and having someone you can call will make more of a difference than having a gun,? Smith says.

Some gun-rights supporters ? including women with guns ? say some additional firearm controls, such as an assault-weapons ban and limits on high-capacity magazines, would help to curb gun violence.?

?Handguns are more than enough for a woman to protect herself,? says Tom Cheffro, owner of Boston Firearms Training Center.

Amy Forbes, a teacher from Peabody, Mass., took Mr. Cheffro?s firearm safety training course so that she can apply for her firearm?s license and eventually buy a gun ? one that would be easy for her to handle.

?You just don?t know what will happen,? Ms. Forbes says. During the hands-on training course, she learned safe handling and shooting techniques, which she says make her feel prepared for owning a weapon and defending herself.

But she supports stricter background checks for all gun sales to try to keep guns out of the hands of people with mental-health issues.

?I would support requiring a doctor?s note before being able to get a gun license, so people have to prove they are mentally stable,? says Forbes.

Source: http://www.minnpost.com/christian-science-monitor/2013/02/why-gun-ownership-among-us-women-climbing

marquette university marquette city creek center hilary duff michigan state michigan state andrew luck pro day

Obesity coverage in black newspapers is mostly negative, MU study finds

Obesity coverage in black newspapers is mostly negative, MU study finds [ Back to EurekAlert! ] Public release date: 14-Feb-2013
[ | E-mail | Share Share ]

Contact: Nathan Hurst
hurstn@missouri.edu
573-882-6217
University of Missouri-Columbia

Negative health stories could discourage men in the African-American community from taking action

COLUMBIA, Mo. -- Obesity rates have increased dramatically in the last few decades. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, African Americans make up more than 60 percent of the overweight and obese population, while only 13 percent of the total population. A new study from the University of Missouri School of Journalism shows that American newspapers, and specifically newspapers geared toward an African-American audience, frame stories on obesity in a negative way. Hyunmin Lee, who performed her research while a doctoral student at MU, says this negative framing could have damaging effects on African Americans looking to lose weight.

"Previous research has shown that African Americans do not respond positively to negative news stories about obesity and health issues," said Lee, who is now an assistant professor at St. Louis University. "Our study shows that the majority of obesity news stories are written in a negative tone, mainly attributing individual responsibilities to overcome obesity, which means many African Americans in need of weight loss could be discouraged by what they are reading in newspapers, instead of being inspired by positive success stories about overcoming obesity or other health problems."

Lee and Maria Len-Rios, an associate professor in the MU School of Journalism, examined 35 newspapers, 23 of them African-American newspapers, and analyzed nearly 400 news stories about obesity. They found that nearly all of those stories were written with negative tones emphasizing individual responsibilities for overcoming obesity. News stories with negative tones include stories about high obesity rates among African Americans and health issues that are caused by obesity.

"The majority of the obesity news stories we analyzed focused on individual responsibilities and solutions that may not be achievable for many African Americans," Lee said. "Even the stories that offered advice on ways to fight obesity were framed negatively. That advice was heavily attributed to individual responsibilities such as exercise and diet control, which are messages that are often ineffective at motivating African Americans to be healthy for socio-economic and cultural reasons."

Lee encourages newspapers, particularly ones with primarily African-American audiences, to write health stories with positive tones. Instead of stories about increasing obesity rates, she says stories promoting promising new research or positive trends in African-American health would be much more effective in motivating African Americans to make healthier choices.

"Newspapers focused on writing health stories that only emphasize individual responsibilities are missing the bigger picture of social responsibility," Lee said. "To make a constructive impact on the community, health stories that mention societal responsibilities are a necessity while avoiding advice solely focused on individual responsibility. This is because many health news stories do not consider that their audiences may live in food deserts or lack the facilities or ability to exercise safely where they live. Telling someone they have to do things that they physically cannot do to be healthy can have very discouraging and counterproductive effects on an audience that needs as much encouragement as possible."

###

Lee and Len-Rios' study has been accepted for publication in the Journal of Health Communication.



[ Back to EurekAlert! ] [ | E-mail | Share Share ]

?


AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert! system.


Obesity coverage in black newspapers is mostly negative, MU study finds [ Back to EurekAlert! ] Public release date: 14-Feb-2013
[ | E-mail | Share Share ]

Contact: Nathan Hurst
hurstn@missouri.edu
573-882-6217
University of Missouri-Columbia

Negative health stories could discourage men in the African-American community from taking action

COLUMBIA, Mo. -- Obesity rates have increased dramatically in the last few decades. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, African Americans make up more than 60 percent of the overweight and obese population, while only 13 percent of the total population. A new study from the University of Missouri School of Journalism shows that American newspapers, and specifically newspapers geared toward an African-American audience, frame stories on obesity in a negative way. Hyunmin Lee, who performed her research while a doctoral student at MU, says this negative framing could have damaging effects on African Americans looking to lose weight.

"Previous research has shown that African Americans do not respond positively to negative news stories about obesity and health issues," said Lee, who is now an assistant professor at St. Louis University. "Our study shows that the majority of obesity news stories are written in a negative tone, mainly attributing individual responsibilities to overcome obesity, which means many African Americans in need of weight loss could be discouraged by what they are reading in newspapers, instead of being inspired by positive success stories about overcoming obesity or other health problems."

Lee and Maria Len-Rios, an associate professor in the MU School of Journalism, examined 35 newspapers, 23 of them African-American newspapers, and analyzed nearly 400 news stories about obesity. They found that nearly all of those stories were written with negative tones emphasizing individual responsibilities for overcoming obesity. News stories with negative tones include stories about high obesity rates among African Americans and health issues that are caused by obesity.

"The majority of the obesity news stories we analyzed focused on individual responsibilities and solutions that may not be achievable for many African Americans," Lee said. "Even the stories that offered advice on ways to fight obesity were framed negatively. That advice was heavily attributed to individual responsibilities such as exercise and diet control, which are messages that are often ineffective at motivating African Americans to be healthy for socio-economic and cultural reasons."

Lee encourages newspapers, particularly ones with primarily African-American audiences, to write health stories with positive tones. Instead of stories about increasing obesity rates, she says stories promoting promising new research or positive trends in African-American health would be much more effective in motivating African Americans to make healthier choices.

"Newspapers focused on writing health stories that only emphasize individual responsibilities are missing the bigger picture of social responsibility," Lee said. "To make a constructive impact on the community, health stories that mention societal responsibilities are a necessity while avoiding advice solely focused on individual responsibility. This is because many health news stories do not consider that their audiences may live in food deserts or lack the facilities or ability to exercise safely where they live. Telling someone they have to do things that they physically cannot do to be healthy can have very discouraging and counterproductive effects on an audience that needs as much encouragement as possible."

###

Lee and Len-Rios' study has been accepted for publication in the Journal of Health Communication.



[ Back to EurekAlert! ] [ | E-mail | Share Share ]

?


AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert! system.


Source: http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2013-02/uom-oci021413.php

kendrick perkins steve jones emily maynard kola boof burmese python ferris bueller god bless america

Thursday, February 14, 2013

Rivera plans to announce if this is final season

TAMPA, Fla. (AP) ? New York Yankees closer Mariano Rivera said he's reached a decision on whether this will be his final season and plans to announce it before opening day.

"Yes, I have," Rivera said Wednesday after the Yankees' first spring training workout for pitchers and catchers. "But again, I will tell you guys when I think it's the right moment."

Baseball's career saves leader had surgery June 12 to repair a torn anterior cruciate ligament in his right knee, an injury that occurred while he was shagging fly balls during batting practice in Kansas City on May 3.

The 43-year-old right-hander expects to be ready for the regular season. He threw 25 pitches off a bullpen mound and said it felt good.

"It was wonderful to be out there again," Rivera said.

When asked on a scale of one to 10 how the knee currently is, Rivera said, "around nine, for sure."

He added: "The other point will be the running that I do here."

Rivera wore a small, light-weight brace during Wednesday's workout, which had him also take part in fielding drills, including covering first base. He is planning to use a brace in games this year.

Rivera will continue shagging fly balls in batting practice, an activity that has the approval of Yankees manager Joe Girardi.

"That's part of who he is," Girardi said. "So, I don't want to take it away from him."

Rivera will likely pitch his normal seven or eight innings in spring training games, but could throw additional batting practice sessions or simulated games.

"We really don't have a whole lot of restrictions on Mo," Girardi said. "We will watch him carefully to make sure that we don't think he's taxing it too much. We feel pretty good about where he's at."

NOTES: LHP Andy Pettitte decided not to pitch in the World Baseball Classic after talking with team officials that included Girardi and general manager Brian Cashman. "I wanted to play," Pettitte said. "Obviously, after having some conversations with the Yankees ? (who were) not too excited about me playing in it ? just decided against it. It was a tough decision. I've never had a chance to play for my country, but it was a real big deal to me. And was really, really, really considering do that. It was one of those deals where I felt like this was probably the best move that I could make for this organization and for our team."

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/rivera-plans-announce-final-season-185554174--mlb.html

new orleans saints ireland bracket vangogh yield crossbow airhead

Why You Should Never Have More Than Nine Browser Tabs Open

Why You Should Never Have More Than Nine Browser Tabs OpenI often hear people complain that their browser is slow and unstable. It's easy to blame browser developers for using sloppy coding practices and not managing memory correctly, but in my experience there's a more common element: people who insist on having dozens of browser tabs open at once. That's an unproductive and pointless practice and everyone should stop it immediately.

Open enough browser tabs and it doesn't matter whether you're running Chrome or Firefox or IE or Safari or Opera: your system is going to slow down and eventually your browser will crash altogether, quite possibly bringing your entire environment down with it. Quite aside from that performance drama, there are at least four obvious reasons why having multiple tabs open is pointless.

You Can't See What's In Them Anyway

"I want to be able to refer to that later" is the underlying argument of many chronic new tab openers. But when you have so many tabs open that you can't see anything but the favicons, you'll waste lots of time hunting down that one elusive page. With nine open, you can see the page titles easily.

Your Browser History Is a Better Solution

You run into an interesting article and figure you'll check it out later. You don't need to keep it open?your browser is tracking your history. As long as you can remember one or two keywords, you can easily hunt it down when you want it. Your computer is more efficient at searching than you are. Let it do the work.

You Can't Process That Much Information Simultaneously

Dozens of open tabs signifies either procrastination on a truly epic scale or a chronic inability to focus on an immediate task at hand. Either way, it's not the sign of someone working efficiently. I work as a journalist?sourcing information from multiple sources is a big part of the job?but I don't kid myself I need thirty of them open at once. Absorb the data from one place, then move on.

It Wastes Good Keyboard Shortcuts

Those reasons easily justify not having multiple tabs open, but why pick 9 as the upper limit? Simple: every modern browser supports using Ctrl-1 to go to the first open tab, Ctrl-2 to the second, and so on. If you have windows that are constantly open (your mail client, social networking, content management systems), you can keep them in the same location and switch to them instantly using the keyboard. Granted, this still works even if you have 40 open, but it makes sense to match the available shortcuts with your screen real estate. (Control-9 always jumps to the last tab, however many you have open, by the way.)

The next time you're asked to support someone who can't control their Control-T-loving fingers, tell them to ease back on the tabs. Life will be better for everyone, I promise.

Why You Should Never Have More Than Nine Browser Tabs Open | Lifehacker Australia


Angus Kidman is an editor at Lifehacker Australia. Follow him on Twitter @gusworldau.

Image via Carsten Reisinger (Shutterstock).

Want to see your work on Lifehacker? Email Tessa.

Source: http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/lifehacker/full/~3/lCJ9slD__Lg/why-you-should-never-have-more-than-nine-browser-tabs-open

law school rankings ncaa bracket predictions jeff foxworthy heather morris the bachelor finale march madness bracket south by southwest

Anti-DOMA plaintiff Charlie Morgan dies of breast cancer before ...

By Karen McVeigh, The Guardian
Tuesday, February 12, 2013 15:35 EST

?

Soldier who fought for same-sex equality succumbs to breast cancer before Supreme Court ruling on Defence of Marriage Act

Charlie Morgan, a career soldier from New Hampshire, has been at the forefront of the battle for equality for years. She came out on TV when the US military?s ?don?t ask, don?t tell? policy came to an end, in 2011, and is part of one of eight couples named as plaintiffs in a lawsuit challenging the federal Defense of Marriage Act (Doma).

But Morgan, 48, died on Sunday, of breast cancer, before the lawsuit was heard by the US supreme court, dashing her hope that Doma would die before she did. The court is expected to rule on the law later this year.

Morgan leaves behind a wife, Karen, who will not be eligible for the survivor benefits afforded to a male military spouse, and nor for social security benefits that would help her take care of their 5-year-old daughter, Casey.

The couple were legally married in New Hampshire after a 12-year legal partnership, but Doma only recognises a spouse as someone of the opposite sex, thus prohibiting recognition for lawful marriages between same-sex couples.

Morgan?s breast cancer was diagnosed in 2008. A chief warrant officer for the New Hampshire National Guard, she and her wife repeatedly spoke out about how Doma would hurt their family if she died. They appeared in a poignant video for Freedom To Marry, calling for Doma?s repeal.

In an interview last year, Morgan?told the Washington Post?that same-sex couples wanted more than financial equality with heterosexual soldiers and their families, in order to feel like they really belonged.

Allyson Robinson, the executive director of OutServe-SLDN, paid tribute to ?a courageous fighter for our country, for her family, and for the equality of all who wear the uniform of our nation?.

In a?statement announcing Morgan?s death, Robinson said: ?She made an indelible mark on everyone she met with her integrity, her positive outlook, and her unflinching commitment to righting the wrongs visited upon gay and lesbian military families. The fight for full LGBT equality in this country is forever changed because Charlie Morgan took up the cause.?

On Monday, Leon Panetta, the defense secretary, announced a raft of benefits the military would now grant to military members and retirees with same-sex partners. He said it marked the completion of the repeal of the ?don?t ask don?t tell? policy, which barred gay and lesbian military members from serving openly.

The move, which will make benefits such as military IDs, legal assistance and childcare, morale, welfare and recreation programs available to gay troops with same-sex partners as early as 31 August, was welcomed as a historic step by rights groups. The Department of Homeland Security and the Coast Guard said it would extend the same benefits as those announced by the Pentagon. However, many of the benefits, such as those covering housing, medical and dental care are not included, because they are restricted under Doma.

In a?memo to service chiefs outlining the policy, Panetta wrote: ?In the event that the Defense of Marriage Act is no longer applicable to the Department of Defense, it will be the policy of the department to construe the words ?spouse? and ?marriage? without regard to sexual orientation and married couples, irrespective of sexual orientation and their dependants, will be granted full military benefits.?

The?Washington Blade reported on Monday?that the benefits could not be applied posthumously, so Morgan?s family will not be eligible for them.

? Guardian News and Media 2013

?

?

?

?

?

Source: http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/02/12/anti-doma-plaintiff-charlie-morgan-dies-of-breast-cancer-before-supreme-court-ruling/

nikki minaj album of the year grammy red carpet grammy award winners the band perry grammy awards whitney houston autopsy

Wednesday, February 13, 2013

Winner of top dog competition heads to Broadway

Ernesto Lara runs with Banana Joe, an affenpinscher, who won best in show during the 137th Westminster Kennel Club dog show Tuesday, Feb. 12, 2013, at Madison Square Garden in New York. (AP Photo/Frank Franklin II)

Ernesto Lara runs with Banana Joe, an affenpinscher, who won best in show during the 137th Westminster Kennel Club dog show Tuesday, Feb. 12, 2013, at Madison Square Garden in New York. (AP Photo/Frank Franklin II)

Banana Joe, an affenpinscher who won best in show during the 137th Westminster Kennel Club dog show, walks in the ring Tuesday, Feb. 12, 2013, at Madison Square Garden in New York. (AP Photo/Frank Franklin II)

NEW YORK (AP) ? The Best in Show winner at the Westminster Kennel Club Dog Show is heading to Broadway. Not to see a show ? to be in one.

The Roundabout Theatre Company said Banana Joe, the 5-year-old affenpinscher who emerged triumphant Tuesday at America's premier dog competition, will appear for one night only in "The Mystery of Edwin Drood" on Wednesday.

The dog will replace Macaco, the 5-year old Maltese-Yorkie mix that is the real-life pet of actress Stephanie J. Block. The role requires very little: Block at one point appears to bolt from the theater in a huff while carrying a dog.

"Drood" and the revival of "Annie" are the only Broadway shows that currently feature live animals. Later this spring, a cat joins the fraternity when "Breakfast at Tiffany's" opens.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/4e67281c3f754d0696fbfdee0f3f1469/Article_2013-02-13-US-Theater-Banana-Joe/id-37fda90a638048fea1c4e129911d96c3

giuliana rancic giuliana rancic elie wiesel temptations work hard play hard tim ferriss wmt

Japan plans to give patrol boats to Manila: report

Japan plans to donate patrol boats costing $11 million each to the Philippines, ramping up regional efforts to monitor China's maritime activity in disputed waters, a newspaper said Monday.

The Japanese government plans to finance the deal in its fiscal 2013 budget starting in April and hopes to officially sign it early next year, the Nikkei business daily reported.

Japan will then provide the Philippines with the newly built patrol vessels, which will cost more than one billion yen ($11 million) each, the newspaper said, without specifying the number of boats on offer.

Both countries are locked in separate territorial disputes with China.

Japan's dispute is over a group of uninhabited islands in the East China Sea known as the Senkakus in Japan and the Diaoyus in China.

The Philippines is one of several Southeast Asian countries, including Vietnam, that are rowing with China over claims to parts of the South China Sea. Two of the hotspots are the Spratly islands and Scarborough Shoal.

The Japanese coastguard also plans to train Philippine and Vietnamese personnel as part of additional efforts to boost security cooperation with Southeast Asia, the Nikkei said.

In the fiscal 2013 budget draft, 2.5 billion yen has been allotted for such expenditure, it said.

Last month, Japanese Foreign Minister Fumio Kishida visited Manila and called for stronger ties with the Philippines to help ensure regional peace.

Japan's coastguard last month said it would create a special unit comprising 10 new large patrol boats to boost its surveillance of the Senkaku/Diaoyu islands.

The long-running row over the islands intensified in September when Tokyo nationalised part of the chain, triggering fury in Beijing and huge anti-Japan demonstrations across China.

In the most serious high-seas incident yet, Japan last week said that a Chinese frigate locked its weapon-targeting radar on a Japanese navy vessel on January 30. China has angrily denied the charge.

Source: http://www.spacewar.com/reports/Japan_plans_to_give_patrol_boats_to_Manila_report_999.html

Latest Presidential Polls trump presidential debate debate marco scutaro Russell Means Taylor Swift Red